 |
Where do I even
begin? Oh, I know… how about…
at the beginning? Ahem. In the beginning,
there was “The Matrix.” People
saw it and said, “It was good.”
This was followed by “The Matrix Reloaded.”
People saw it and said, “It was okay,
but we’ll forgive it because it’s
just a lead-in for the big finale.”
A few months later saw the release of “The
Matrix Revolutions.” People saw it
and said, “Huh?”
I’m not really sure what the Wachowski
Brothers had in mind when they decided to
take the storyline of “The Matrix”
and expand it to fill two more movies, several
animated shorts, a video game and a cereal
box. I think it might have been the call
of the almighty dollar and the knowledge
that everyone on the planet would buy into
the product whether it was good or not.
That’s what really rubbed me the wrong
way about the sequels. I considered the
first film to be a work of genius.
|
It was one of the most stylish and technically
complicated films I had ever seen and it made
the fact that Keanu Reeves cannot act a moot point.
But more importantly, even though it had an extremely
intricate plot that demanded your full attention,
it was well-written enough to actually make sense
at the end of the day.
I’ve watched “The Matrix” many
times simply because it’s so darn cool.
It’s one of those movies that I can walk
in on halfway through, and insist on watching
‘til the end. Only a handful of movies have
that effect on me. The first movie came out in
1999, and for three years all we heard about was
how the Wachowski Brothers were going to create
two sequels, back to back, and take the myths
created in the first film to new heights. Oh,
and they would also be the most complex films
ever produced.
For three years audiences waited. The anticipation
grew. Then the first teaser trailer for “The
Matrix Reloaded” was released and it blew
people away (including me). I couldn’t wait
to see the next chapter of the saga (in spite
of Reeves…). Then of course, the film opened.
There was no question that the film was incredibly
complex technically, but for all its hoopla, it
just kind of fizzled. (Check here
for mine and Joe’s original comments on
“The Matrix Reloaded”)
When I walked out of “The Matrix Reloaded”,
I was tired and confused. But I thought to myself,
“Okay. Well since the next movie is only
a few months away, I won’t try to figure
things out. I’ll wait until it’s all
explained in the final chapter.” Skip to
a few months later. I slipped into a screening
of “The Matrix Revolutions” and prepared
myself to be entertained and to have all the mysteries
of the universe revealed to me. The new trailer
hadn’t looked as good as the one for “Reloaded”,
so with my expectations a little lower, it was
a win-win situation.
Once again I walked out of the theatre tired and
even more confused than before. None of the questions
of the universe had been answered. Actually, nothing
at all was answered. For the entire movie, we
just moved from action sequence to action sequence,
with a lot of expositional scenes of the characters
waxing rhapsodic about nothing. Almost every line
was written in such a way as to make you go, “Oooh,
how meaningful, “ when in reality it amounts
to nothing more than empty posturing.
Now I realize I’m probably going to get
flamed by tons of pseudo-intellectuals who will
tell me I ‘just didn’t get it.’
I will only defend myself by saying that I may
not the smartest guy on the planet, but I am smart
enough to know when I’m being hosed, and
all the dialogue in “The Matrix Revolutions”
is nothing more than a hose job meant to make
it sound like its pointing to some grand design.
In retrospect, perhaps it does… if that
grand design is for the producers to make a lot
of money.
Beyond that, there were some major character flaws
throughout the film. The most memorable (and you
have to be familiar with the films to understand
this) is when Neo is confronted by the character
who is taken over by ‘Mr. Smith’ in
the ‘real world.’ Just how many times
does he have to refer to Neo as “Mr. Anderson”
with that tell-tale little slur before he gets
it that this guy is ‘Smith’? The audience
(at least I hope most of the audience) caught
on within seconds.
I think my main complaint about the sequels is
that they almost don’t seem like they are
part of the same trilogy that “The Matrix”
is apart of. The first film, fantastic as it may
have been plot-wise, still seemed grounded in
reality. Whenever the characters were in the ‘Matrix’,
the world around them looked like our world. With
the exception of the Highway Chase scene in “The
Matrix Reloaded”, all of the sets looked
like… well…sets. Any sense that the
world of the Matrix was our world was gone. It
became too glossy, too clean.
I’m sure that most of you reading this are
now pretty much convinced that I didn’t
like either of the Matrix sequels, however that
isn’t entirely true. Yes, I’m disappointed
in the overall plotting and supposed ‘resolution’,
but I was still very impressed by the technical
aspects of the film. The special effects sequences
are certainly without peer. The extended battle
sequences are gloriously over-the-top, and the
editing almost flawless.
I guess the overall point I’m trying to
make is that if you’re looking for a thinking
man’s film, full of profound wisdom and
deep existential nuggets of truth, you will find
neither here. If however you’re on the prowl
for some eye-popping special effects and wild
visuals, then look no further. A great majority
of this film is like watching a video game, only
without the controllers.
The other saving grace of the film falls into
the lap of actor Hugo Weaving. As Agent Smith,
he completely steals every scene he’s in.
And not just when there’s 375,567,322 of
him in the scene. I first saw Weaving as one of
the cross-dressing Abba-loving entertainers in
“Priscilla, Queen of the Desert”,
and he has gone on to play some of the coolest
roles in recent years, including the elf Elrond
in “The Lord of the Rings” series.
He plays Smith with relish, and is undeniable
the most interesting character in the entire trilogy.
I’m hard-pressed to call him evil, considering
I agree with his assessment in the first film
about the human race being a virus.
“The Matrix Revolutions” is now on
its way to DVD, and this is where some of the
film’s strong suits really shine. The sound
and picture nearly as perfect as you can get on
DVD. And like the releases of the previous films,
the extra features are plentiful. Warner Brothers
made sure to include more than enough to whet
the appetite of fans and non-fans alike.
Set up mostly on the second disc, the longest
is a documentary about the making of the film,
which comes in just under 30 minutes. It’s
pretty good and offers several interviews snippets,
most of which seem a bit self-congratulatory.
The rest of the extras focus on various aspects
of the process of making the film, most notably
the extended CGI effects. One thing I missed is
a director’s commentary from the Wachowski’s.
I would give anything to listen to these two try
to ‘explain’ the philosophies and
mythologies behind their vision just to see if
they could.
Regardless of some of the weaknesses of the second
two films, I am still somewhat of a fan of the
trilogy. I just wish that the Wachowski’s
could have found a way to tie up the entire series
in a way that was more fulfilling to audiences.
The first film had an ending that was completely
satisfying, even though it was a bit open-ended.
The sequels simply ended.
Directed by: The Wachowski Brothers
Starring: Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne
Moss, Hugo Weaving, Jada Pinkett-Smith
Extras: “Revolutions Recalibrated”
– Behind the Scenes Overview
CG Revolution
Super Burly Brawl – A Look at the Final
Showdown
Follow the White Rabbit - Neo-Realism: The Evolution
of Bullet Time, Super Big Mini Models, Double
Agent Smith, Mind Over Matter: The Physicality
of the Matrix
Future Gamer The Matrix Online – An Introduction
to the Massive Multi-player Game, The Matrix Online
3-D Evolutions – Concept Art, Previsualizations
and Realizations
Before the Revolution - Timeline on the Concurrent
Story Development Occurring between the Matrix
Trilogy, The Animatrix and Enter the Matrix
Theatrical Trailer
Specifications: Widescreen, Dolby Digital 5.1
Surround Sound
Studio: Warner Brothers
Release Date: 4/6/2004
Region 1
MPAA Rating: R (For Sci-fi Violence and Brief
Sexual Content)
Website
Website
We'll give Matrix Revolutions a C.
|