 |
There are times
when I hate writing about a film project
based on a Stephen King novel. This because
I have such a strong admiration for the
author’s body of work, in which even
the less than stellar books are often written
much better than anyone else’s in
the genre. Though he’s still amongst
the best selling authors of all time, there
are those who would disagree with me. But
this is because King has a style of writing
that is often too visually and psychologically
stimulating for the average reader whose
favorite books tend to be in the “See
Spot Run…” category. (Just come
to Texas, you’ll see what I mean.)
The problem is that the very items I mentioned
that make King’s books such a great
read for those of us in the higher intellectual
tax bracket are the very things that make
translating his books to film so difficult.
His words are meticulously crafted in order
to create strong images within the imagination
of the reader, so when a filmmaker attempts
to put that image on screen, it often falls
far short of what the human mind can conjure
up.
|
But this is not the only problem King’s
adaptations are wont to suffer from. Often there
is simply the problem of budget. Some producer
grabs the rights to a novel or short story for
no other reason than to grab the title and put
author's name in the credits. He (or she) then
re-writes the story to fit whatever budget is
available or in some case see if they can write
it better (good luck…).
Probably the most famous of these travesties is
in the (oddly enough) well received Stanley Kubrick
version of “The Shining.” This was
a big budget film from a famous director, so unfortunately
audiences were tricked into thinking it would
be a masterpiece. Kubrick admitted to not being
very fond of the book, but thought the concept
was good. He then opted to re-write a lot of the
story to fit his vision. What his vision if “The
Shining” turned into was frightening indeed,
but more so because of the horror experienced
by fans of the original book, wondering what the
hell happened. If you really want to see “The
Shining”, I highly recommend the TV mini-series
version starring Steven Weber. Though it has a
few minute flaws of its own, it is far superior.
But I digress.
The good thing about there being so many adaptations
of King’s works is that there are quite
a few diamonds to be found in the coal bin. If
you have the opportunity to see “Stand by
Me”, “Misery”, “The Dead
Zone”, “Dolores Claiborne”,
“The Shawshank Redemption” or “The
Green Mile’ you will be in for a treat.
These are all terrific movies that should not
be missed. And speaking of those last two, both
are important to this review because they were
adapted and directed by Frank Darabont…
who has now given us a third Stephen King based
movie. Though already underrated by critics and
audiences alike, “The Mist” stands
as yet another diamond amongst the aforementioned
coal.
“The Mist” is based on a novella that
originally appeared in Kirby McCauley’s
horror anthology,”Dark Forces.” Shortly
after its release, an audiotape was released that
featured a live ‘radio play’ of the
story, recorded in what was then a new system
that allowed for a 3-Dimensional effect when listing
in headphones. I not only bought the tape…
I actually still own it. I loved the story, which
followed a group of people trapped in a grocery
store after a strange mist rolls into their town.
Normally a little mist isn’t enough to keep
people from going home… but this mist is
different. There are… things… in it.
Things that drag people away. Things with tentacles.
Things that kill.
The story, whether I was reading it late at night
or opting to throw on some headphones, did its
job. It scared me. My imagination ran wild as
King would describe the shapes and horrors that
moved through the mist. I often though it would
make a great movie, but knew that no special effects
artist could possibly crate a creature that would
live up to my expectations. But these horrors
were not the only reason I was scared by the story,
it was the people trapped inside. King created
a story that was every bit a psychological horror
as it was physical. He threw a group of diverse
people into an unfathomable situation and one
by one they began to turn on each other. They
formed groups and castes within their ranks that
fought against each other. That scared me more
than the monsters. To understand how people can
turn so blindly against one another or follow
those whose level of insanity would be apparent
to any right thinking person. There isn’t
just evil outside the giant glass windows of the
supermarket… there’s also evil inside.
Last year I caught a news item that Frank Darabont
was planning on adapting “The Mist”,
and I about jumped for joy. His previous King
films were two of the absolute best and I knew
that he would be able to deliver another outstanding
film. I wasn’t even as worried about the
look of the creatures because I knew under his
direction KNB Effects would do everything in their
power to match the description from King’s
mind. I followed the production on the internet
and waited for it to come out. Initially I planned
to catch it when it opened in theatres, but it
was released at a time that getting out just wasn’t
an option. I knew I was going to have to wait
for DVD. But let me tell you, it was well worth
the wait.
Darabont delivered a version of “The Mist”
that is compelling, frightening, and faithful
to the original novella, especially when it came
to the psychological aspects of the story. All
of the actors turned in natural and believable
performances, including Thomas Jane as David Drayton.
His concern for his son’s safety served
as a powerful reminder of what a real parent should
feel for their children, especially in terms of
the film’s highly controversial ending.
Nearly stealing the film however is Marcia Gay
Harden as Mrs. Carmody, the town’s religious
fanatic. Her presence is a powerful one, and though
I would hope to never be gullible enough to follow
someone in such an insane frame of mind, I could
see how weaker people might follow her. Harden
absolutely tears up the screen with her performances
Speaking of the film’s controversial ending;
Darabont did have to do some elaborating on the
original novella. He remained faithful in his
adaptation but had to lengthen the story a bit
and concoct and ending. In the novella, the ending
was rather ambiguous and did not have a conclusion.
Darabont’s closure was both welcome and
unwelcome in that it gave the story an ending,
but that ending might not fit how audiences might
want the story to end. It is emotionally powerful,
and unfortunately all too realistic of a possibility
in such an unrealistic situation. While I would
have personally rather had a different emotional
feeling coming out of the film, I applaud his
willingness to go to such and extreme.
“The Mist” is now available in a single
disc and double disc DVD set, but everyone knows
that the 2-disc is the one to get. And for more
than just your normal slew of extra features.
The first disc has a great commentary by Darabont,
who proves to be just as good a speaker as he
is a writer. He provides a lot of insight into
his process of taking the story to screen and
exudes a lot of energy in his love for the genre.
There are also some deleted scenes, most of which
are pretty interesting as well as some must-watch
behind the scenes webisodes. You’ll also
find a featurette on artist Drew Stuzan, whose
posters have graced a ton of films, though it
is interesting to note that his was not used for
this film… and judging from the DVD cover
art that was used, should have been.
There are also several special effects featurettes
on the 2nd disc, along with a lengthy making of
documentary. But the absolute best reason to grab
the 2-disc version is that it includes a black
& white version of the movie. This was how
Darabont envisioned doing the film in the first
place, but the powers that be in the studios wouldn’t
have anything to do with it. They believed a black
& white movie wouldn’t sell tickets,
and sadly they are probably right. However for
intelligent film lovers, watching “The Mist”
in black & white is like a whole new experience.
Devoid of color, the film has a different vibe
and is some ways even more frightening than it
was in its original format. I challenge those
of you who don’t think you’d like
it this way to give it a try late on a dark Saturday
night… all alone… with the lights
out.
“The Mist”, as envisioned by Frank
Darabont is easily added to the top of the food
chain when it comes to Stephen King movies, and
I’m sorry to see it was so overlooked. I
can only hope that it will receive a larger and
more appreciative audience now that its on DVD.
Directed by: Frank Darabont
Starring: Thomas Jane, Marcia Gay Harden, Laurie
Holden, Andre Braugher, Toby Jones
Extras: Feature Commentary by Writer/Director
Frank Darabont, Deleted Scenes with Optional Commentary,
Drew Struzan - An Appreciation of an Artist, Behind
the Scenes Webisodes, Frank Darabont Introduces
“The Mist” in Black & White, The
Complete Feature Film in Black & White, The
Making of the Mist, Taming the Beast, Monsters
Among Us, The Horror of it All
Specifications: Widescreen, Dolby Digital 5.1
Studio: Dimension
Release Date: 3/25/2008
Region: 1
MPAA Rating: R
Website
We'll give The Mist an A+.
|